PARSA SITARAMA RAO & ANOTHER Vs. CHAPALA PITCHAMMA
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Parsa Sitarama Rao And Another
Click here to view full judgement.
The matter originally came up before Siramulu, J. who made the following order of Reference. -
(2.) Siranulu, J. These two revision petitions give rise to a common question of law, Petitioners are common, but the respondents in both the cases are different.
(3.) The material facts leading to these revision petitions may be stated:
The respondents are the cultivating tenants in respect of lands held by them under the petitioners. On the ground that the respondents failed to pay the rents in respect of their agricultural holdings for the years 1955 to 1959, the petitioners served notices on them under Section 19 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act (hereinafter called 'the Act'), terminating their tenancies. After the expiry of six months from the respective dates of notices the petitioners filed eviction petitions against the respondents before the Tahsildar. In both the cases, the Tahsildar held that the respondents were defaulters in payment of rents for the said years and that, their tenancies had been terminated by valid notices and, accordingly cancelled their tenancies and ordered eviction.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.