JUDGEMENT
MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. -
(1.) This writ petition for a Mandamus is filed to declare theaction of the respondents 2 to 4 in opening rowdy sheet No.199 against the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of A.P.
Police Standing Order No.742 and consequently sought
direction to the respondents 2 to4 to close the said rowdy sheet
which was opened against the petitioner.
(2.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents
1 to 4.
(3.) The petitioner claims to be an agriculturist. It is stated that he has been eking out his livelihood by doing agriculture.
He further states that earlier a case in Crime No.76 of 2011 for
the offence punishable under Sec. 302 r/w 34 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860, was registered against him in Mangalagiri
Rural Police Station and he was shown as accused No.4 in the
said crime. The petitioner states that after full-fledged trial
conducted in the Court of III Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Guntur, he was acquitted in the said case of all the
charges as per Judgment dtd. 21/3/2014. No other case is
pending against him. However, it is stated that the respondents
have opened a rowdy sheet No.199 against him earlier on the
ground that he was involved in the said criminal case. But even
after he was acquitted in the said criminal case, it is stated that
the police did not close the said rowdy sheet and they are
continuing the same. Therefore, challenging the said action of
the respondents in continuing the said rowdy sheet and not
closing the same, the present writ petition is filed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.