UDAYSINGH RAMSINGH PAWAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
LAWS(BOM)-2009-1-30
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (FROM: AURANGABAD)
Decided on January 14,2009

UDAYSINGH RAMSINGH PAWAR Appellant
VERSUS
SHRI.MADADU DHONDU MORE Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

SHLINI BHIMRAO GAIKWAD VS. ADVOCATE M.D.MORE [REFERRED TO]
PRADNYA PRADEEP KENKARE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
V P SHETTY VS. SR INSPECTOR OF POLICE [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

SHAKUNTALA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2020-9-32] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

S. S. Shinde, J. - (1.)The present application is filed for quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 15.9.2000 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chalisgaon in Regular Criminal Case No. 227/1998.
(2.)It is the case of the applicant that he is Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Chalisgaon. An employee named Shri.Ananda Shenpadu Sonwane was dismissed from the services for absence from the duties and certain misconduct. The said employee approached to the Labour Court, but he was not granted any relief. He had also filed a complaint under the Schedule Castes & Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for brevity) but that was subsequently dismissed by the learned Special Court, Jalgaon.
(3.)It is the case of the applicant that thereafter, the mother and wife of Shri.Ananda Shepadu Sonwane alongwith one Mr.Namdeo Jadhav met the applicant in his house and requested to reconsider his case sympathetically. The applicant replied that if the application for condoning his lapses is filed and if the legal proceedings are withdrawn, his case can be considered sympathetically.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.