GANESH S/O. KRISHNA MALE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (AT: AURANGABAD)
Ganesh S/O. Krishna Male
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Click here to view full judgement.
VIBHA KANKANWADI,J. -
(1.) Present application has been filed by original accused persons invoking the inherent powers
of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure in order to quash the First
Information Report vide Crime No. 15 of 2015,
registered with Bori Police Station, Bori, Tal.
Jintur, District Parbhani for the offences punishable
under Section 498A, 323, 504 read with Section 34 of
the Indian Penal Code.
(2.) Respondent No.2 got married to applicant No.1 on 24052006. Applicant No.1 is the husband of
respondent No.2, applicants No.2 and 3 are the parents
of applicant No.1, and applicant No.4 is brother of
applicant No.3 (Uncle of applicant No. 1) and
applicant No.5 is wife of applicant No.4. Applicant
No.6 is the aunt of applicant No. 1 and applicant No.
10 is her son. Applicants No. 7 and 9 are the sons of applicant No.4 (Cousin brothers of applicant No. 1).
Applicant No. 8 is the wife of applicant No. 7.
Applicant No. 11 is the married sister of applicant
(3.) Respondent No.2 informant has contended that, her father had given household articles at the time of
marriage. She went to Vasmat to cohabit with husband.
She was residing with all the applicants. She was
treated properly by all of them for about two years
and thereafter they started demanding amount of Rs.2
lakhs for the construction of house. Applicants No. 2
to 11 used to instigate applicant No. 1 for beating
her in order to fulfill their illegal demand. They
used to drove her out of the house, by keeping her
starved, when she used to say that it is not possible
for her father to give amount to them because of his
poor financial condition. She had narrated the ill
treatment to her parents. They had given understanding
to her and sent her back for cohabitation. She was
thereafter treated properly for about 34 months, but
again the demand was made and illtreatment was given.
She has daughter from her husband. She is at her
parents' house since 4 years prior to FIR. Efforts
were made for conciliation, but in vain. Therefore,
she has lodged the report.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.