MR. SANJEEV TARCAR, SON OF LATE PADMANABH TARCAR Vs. ARMINIO RODRIGUES
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (AT: GOA)
Mr. Sanjeev Tarcar, Son Of Late Padmanabh Tarcar
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Rule made returnable forthwith. The learned
Counsel for the respondents, waives service. Heard finally by
consent of parties.
(2.) By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated
19.09.2017, by which, an application (Exhibit-D/24), filed by the petitioner, seeking time to cross examine PW-1, has been
(3.) A perusal of the impugned order shows that on two previous dates of hearing i.e. on 29.08.2017 and 11.09.2017,
time was sought on behalf of the petitioner, which was granted
with a stipulation that no further time shall be granted. Yet
again, an application (Exhibit-D/24) was moved on behalf of the
petitioner, seeking time on the ground that the Advocate has no
instructions to cross examine the respondent (applicant before
the Trial Court).;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.