VINOD PRALHADRAO FARKADE Vs. CEEKAY DAIKIN LTD., AURANGABAD
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (AT: AURANGABAD)
Vinod Pralhadrao Farkade
Ceekay Daikin Ltd.
Click here to view full judgement.
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J. -
(1.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
(2.) The Petitioner/ Employee is aggrieved by the part-1 judgment of the Labour Court dated 26.06.2015 in Reference (IDA) No.3/2008 by which it was concluded that the enquiry conducted against the Petitioner/ workman is fair and proper and the findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse.
(3.) When this matter was heard by this Court initially on 15.02.2016, both the learned Advocates stated that they have no objection if this Court hears this matter. The same has been recorded in the order dated 15.02.2016.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.