GANESH MURLIDHAR CHAUDHARI Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
LAWS(BOM)-2016-2-31
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (AT: AURANGABAD)
Decided on February 17,2016

Ganesh Murlidhar Chaudhari Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, taken up for final hearing.
(2.) The brief facts, necessary for deciding this Petition, are that, the petitioner is appointed as peon in the Village Panchayat at Nashirabad, Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon on 1st April, 1999 and since then he is serving on the said post for last more than 15 years. The Respondent No.1 issued circular on 6th April, 2005 directing all the concern Zilla Parishads to reserve 10% quota of ClassIII and ClassIV posts to the Village Panchayat employees in Zilla Parishad in direct recruitment process and to make available same to the employees of the village panchayat completing 10 years of their services, as per their qualification and giving age relaxation upto 45 of age. It is the case of the petitioner that, the representations were made by the petitioner initially on 11th February, 2011, and 6th April, 2011 to the Respondent No.4, for including his name in the seniority list, but it was in vain, and finally the name was included in the seniority list on 22nd February, 2013, and due to the negligence of the respondents, the petitioner lose his opportunity in the year 2010, 2011 and 2012.
(3.) The Respondent No.4 Published The Seniority list of the village panchayat employees for the Jalgaon district on 3rd March, 2014, wherein the name of the petitioner is at Sr. No. 239 in the seniority list. However, the name of the petitioner was not included in the seniority list published in the year 2015 on the ground that, he has crossed 45 years age.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.