(1.) THIS appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 takes exception to the judgment of the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation dated 4 -10 -2004 to the extent the appellant has been held jointly and severally liable to pay the amount of compensation with 12 % interest per annum along with respondent No. 2.
(2.) IT is the case of respondent No. 1 that he was employed with the respondent No. 2 on the post of Jobber/Machine Operator. He was receiving salary of Rs. 3500/ - per month. In an accident that occurred on 7 -8 -1999, respondent No. 1 suffered various injuries. He, therefore, filed application under Section 22 of the said Act seeking compensation.
(3.) BEFORE the learned Commissioner, respondent No. 1 examined himself at Exhibit -22 and a Doctor at Exhibit -39. Respondent No. 2 examined one witness vide Exhibit -52 while the appellant examined one witness at Exhibit -58. After considering aforesaid evidence, the learned Commissioner came to the conclusion that the appellant as well as respondent No. 2 were jointly and severally liable to satisfy the claim for compensation. Accordingly, both were held liable to pay compensation of Rs. 92,227/ - with interest at 12% per annum. Hence, this appeal.