PRASHANT BABUSAHEB GHIRAMKAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
LAWS(BOM)-2013-9-48
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Decided on September 21,2013

Prashant Babusaheb Ghiramkar Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

MASUDEO VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-2-7] [REFERRED TO]
BALASAHEB SAHEBRAO BODKHE VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2016-8-56] [REFERRED TO]
AVINASH RAMKRISHNA KASHIWAR VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-31] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Rule. Returnable forthwith. By consent of Counsel, the Petition is taken up for final hearing.
(2.)By this Petition which is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Petitioner is seeking an appropriate writ, order and direction, directing Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to shift the Headquarter and Sub-divisional Office at Daund as far as Daund and Purandar Taluka is concerned.
(3.)Petitioner is aggrieved by the Notification dated 26 June 2013 issued by Respondents in which the Headquarter and Sub-Divisional Office of Purandar and Daund Talukas is shown at Pune, though in the draft Notification, the Headquarter is shown at Purandar (Saswad).


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.