JUDGEMENT
Anoop V. Mohta, J. -
(1.) The Petitioner developer, has invoked Section 9 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act,
1996) in view of existence of Arbitration clause between the parties in
the redevelopment agreement.
(2.) Rusi Ruttonshaw Todiwalla (since deceased), Dara Ruttonshaw
Todiwalla (since deceased), Phiroze Ruttonshaw Todiwalla, Coomi
Sheriar Patel, Perin Homi Dastur, Soona Adi Lalkaka and Mehroo Keki
Bengali were the owners of the property mentioned in the Petition.
They granted development rights to one Mr. Virendrakumar Jhamb.
They executed two Powers of Attorney in favour of Mr. Jhamb on 4
March 1980 and a third Power of Attorney dated 7 October 2002,
authorizing him to develop the property, and sign and executed
conveyances in favour of the Society (Respondent No. 1). On 24
January 1983, Respondent No.1 Society registered, having 160
members. Between the year 1985 to 1986, the two buildings with
eight wings (A to H) were constructed on Plot bearing CTS No.
1231/5, Village Versova, Yari Road, Andheri (West), Mumbai.
Respondent No.1 Society proposed for a redevelopment in the year
2006. The Deputy Registrar directed Respondent No.1 Society to
carry out the structural audit in accordance with the approved bye
law No. 77. Under bye law 158(c), Respondent No.1 Society was
directed to give tender notice for the redevelopment. The entire
redevelopment process was as directed, re started.
(3.) On 10 July 2007, Respondent No.1 Society, decided to go for
redevelopment, which was supported by 142 members out of 160
members. The minority members gave complaint to the Deputy
Registrar making various allegations. The Deputy Registrar vide a
letter dated 10 July 2007, gave directions to Respondent No. 1 Society
to take proper steps for redevelopment scheme.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.