MAHARASHTRA STATE BRANCH OF INDIA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Maharashtra State Branch Of India
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) The matter was adjourned from time to time since 05.10.2020. On 28.10.2020 and 04.11.2020 we
had heard Mr. Chapalgaonkar, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Karlekar, learned A.G.P. to
the extent of interim relief claimed by the
petitioner qua the rates as may applicable for non
Covid-19 patients. On 04.11.2020, we had
adjourned the matter at the request of Mr.
Karlekar, learned A.G.P. to take further
instruction as some documents/literature filed by
the petitioner. The matter was kept on 06.11.2020.
(2.) Today, after the matter was called out Mr. Karlekar, learned A.G.P. submits that the praecipe
is moved by the State before the Hon'ble the Chief
Justice to club and/or consolidate all the matters
for being heard and disposed of by the same Bench.
The grounds of challenge to the Government
Resolution issued during the pandemic vis-a-vis the
rates to be charged, involved similar questions of
law and petitions are pending before the Bench at
Nagpur, Aurangabad and also at the Principal Seat
at Bombay. The said praecipe appears to have been
filed on 28.10.2020. No orders are passed on the
(3.) We have heard to the extent of interim relief claimed by the petitioner vis-a-vis non
Covid patients only on earlier dates. The
challenge to the entire notification as applicable
to the Covid patients is not considered by us.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.