HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (AT: NAGPUR)
Click here to view full judgement.
PUSHPA V GANEDIWALA,J. -
(1.) This Bench has been constituted to answer the following question referred by the Single Bench of this Court
vide order dated 24/10/2018 :-
"Whether prosecution of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1888, is hit by the bar created by sub-section (2) of Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 ?"
(2.) In Sai Accumulator Industries, Sangamner Vs. Sethi Brothers, Aurangabad, 2016(5) Mh.LJ 936 the Single Bench of this Court took a
view that the complaint filed by an unregistered firm under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1888 (in short
"N.I. Act") is not tenable in law in view of the bar under Section
69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (in short "the Act of 1932").
(3.) The learned referral Judge expressed a diagonally opposite view and referred the question for consideration of the
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.