ABDUL RAHIM RAHEMAN SHAIKH Vs. SAIDA ABDUL RAHIM SHAIKH AND ORS.
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Abdul Rahim Raheman Shaikh
Saida Abdul Rahim Shaikh And Ors.
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.
(2.) The learned counsel for the petitioner/husband argued that the learned courts below totally erred in assessing the amount of maintenance in the wake of earnings of the respondent/wife.
He submitted that the respondent/wife is getting income of
Rs.1800/- by way of pension and rent from tenants, where as the
petitioner/husband is getting pension of Rs.1700/-. He is aged
about 65 years.
(3.) As against this, the learned counsel for the respondent/wife argued that the petitioner/husband was working
as a driver. He is a retired driver having been superannuated from
the services of State Transport Corporation. Therefore, the
impugned order is correct and infact the maintenance is required
to be enhanced to the original award of Rs.5,000/- per month.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.