SANJIV KUMAR SISODIA Vs. SRI RUDRA PRATAP SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the record.

(2.) This contempt application has been filed for drawing proceeding against the opposite party for committing contempt of this Court by flouting order dated 26.3.1999 passed by Civil Judge (SD), Agra in Execution Case No. 3 of 1998 as well as the interim orders dated 6.1.2000 and 13.1.2000 as also the consequential order dated 11.3.2015 passed in FAFO No. 1444 of 1999. The order dated 26.3.1999 is an order staying execution proceeding for a limited period up to 24.9.1999. The subsequent order dated 6.1.2000 passed in FAFO No. 1444 of 1999 is an interim order which stayed the execution proceeding till 21.1.2000. The next interim order dated 13.1.2000 is again an interim order which continued the earlier interim order till 29.2000. The order dated 11.3.2015 passed in FAFO No. 1444 of 1999 is being reproduced herein below;

(3.) As the order dated 11.2015 was not by way of injunction but a step in further proceeding in the appeal, the appropriate course available is to move an application in the pending appeal. In so far as the orders dated 6.1.2000 and 11.2000 are concerned, they being operative for a limited period of time, this Court, by its order dated 18.7.2017, directed the office to produce the record of FAFO No. 1444 of 1999 to enable this Court to ascertain whether the aforesaid interim order has been extended or not.