NILESH MISHRA Vs. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS MAINPURI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri K.N. Tripathi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri P.K. Jain for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

(2.) THESE are two connected petitions filed by the same petitioner. Writ Petition No. 29060 of 1993 was filed challenging the order dated 06.07.1993 passed by the Manager of the institution terminating his services. Writ Petition No. 1488 of 2006 claiming regularisation under Section 33-C of the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Act and Rule 17 of 1998 Rules.

(3.) DURING the pendency of the proceedings, an impleadment application was filed on behalf of one Ratan Lal Gupta and S.P. Verma claiming to be teachers in L.T. Grade in the same institution and asserting their right to ad hoc promotion before any direct recruitment could be made. It has also been stated in the said affidavit that vacancy was never requisitioned. It is further pleaded that proceedings for direct recruitment could only be resorted to in case no suitable candidate is available for such ad hoc promotion.