AASHU Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the papers.

(2.) IT has been argued that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated and the medical examination report do not support the contention of the F.I.R. IT has also been argued that no MMS has been recovered from the accused-applicant. IT has further been argued that the accused-applicant was not involved in unnatural intercourse with the son of the complainant and has been falsely implicated.