KUSUM KALI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THIS petition is directed against an order dated 7.11.2005 by which the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Mukhya Sevika has been rejected.

(3.) IT appears thereafter certain Anganwadi Workers were appointed to the post of Mukhya Sevika in 2005 but the petitioner was left out and no action was forthcoming despite approaching the authorities through representation, therefore, she preferred Writ Petition 61333 of 2005 which was disposed off by an order dated 16.9.2005 directing the respondents to consider her claim by a reasoned order.