BASUDEV Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
LAWS(ALL)-2012-1-644
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 13,2012

BASUDEV Appellant
VERSUS
State of U.P. and others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.)HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate. This writ petition has been filed for quashing an F.I.R. and staying the arrest of the petitioner in Case Crime No. 1567 of 2011, under Section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, police station, Kotwali Nagar, District Budaun. It cannot be said that on the allegations in the FIR, no prima facie case is disclosed.
(2.)BY the amendment vide Act No. 5 of 2009, which has come into effect from 01.11.2010, it has been provided in Section 41(1)(b) Cr.P.C. that a person against whom credible information of being involved in a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less is reported to the police officer, the accused can only be arrested if the police officer is satisfied that:
(a) there is probability of the accused committing another offence, (b) for proper investigation of the offence, (c) to prevent such person from causing the evidence of the offence to disappear or his tampering with the evidence in any manner, (d) to prevent such person from making any inducement, threat or promise to the witnesses to disclose such facts to the court or to the police, (e) unless the person is arrested, his presence in court could not be ensured and the police officer has to record the reasons in writing before making such arrest.

(3.)THE present case is one punishable with imprisonment upto 7 years. The petitioner should, therefore has no apprehension that he would be arrested unless there are conditions justifying his arrest as mentioned above and provided under section 41(1)(b) Cr.P.C.
Also under the newly introduced provision, section 41A Cr.P.C. (which has also been added by Act No. 5 of 2009, effective from 1.11.2010), in all cases where the arrest of such an accused is not needed in view of the provision of section 41(1) Cr.P.C., the police officer concerned is required to issue a notice directing the accused to appear before him at a specified place and time. However if at any time the accused fails to comply with the terms of the notice, or fails to identify himself, or the police officer is of the opinion that the arrest is required, he may arrest the said accused after recording his reasons for the same. The police powers of arrest will however be subject to any orders that may have been passed by the Competent Court.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.