M.MURUGAN Vs. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) These two writ appeals have been filed against the common order passed in W.P.(MD)Nos.19740 and 20199 of 2018. The
petitioner in the writ petitions is the appellant in these appeals.
(2.) W.P.(MD)No.19740 of 2018 was filed by the appellant for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent or
any other independent agency under the State Government to
enquire into the tender process in connection with Tender Notice
No.2/2018-19/HDO, dated 25.06.2018 and Tender Notice No.
8/2018-19/HDO, dated 08.09.2018 regarding the allegations of illegal gratification and take appropriate action against the third
respondent and other erred official and consequently to direct the
respondents to call for fresh tenders for the works mentioned in
Tender Notice No.2/2018-19/HDO, dated 25.06.2018 in a fair and
transparent manner by following the procedures.
(3.) W.P.(MD)No.20199 of 2018 was filed by the appellant for issuance of a Writ of Certiorafied Mandamus, to call for the entire
records pertaining to the proceedings of the first respondent in
Tender Notice No.08/2018-19/HDO, dated 08.09.2018 and quash
the same as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently to direct
the first respondent to forthwith award work order in view of
acceptance message sent by tender accepting authority, dated
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.