BHIMLAL PANDIT Vs. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
LAWS(MAD)-2014-9-35
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Decided on September 16,2014

Bhimlal Pandit Appellant
VERSUS
Intelligence Officer Director Of Revenue Intelligence Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking to enlarge him on bail in connection with the case registered against him by the respondent in R.R. No. 4 of 2013 for the offences punishable under Section 8 (c) read with Section 22, 25 and 28 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (in short NDPS) read with Section 135 of Customs Act, 1962.
(2.) The case of the prosecution is that on the basis of a tip off received by them that a parcel weighing 50 kgs of substance covered under the NDPS Act is being transported from New Delhi to Chennai by M/s. Rama Trading Company, New Delhi to M/s. Sri Balaji Enterprises, Chennai through Railway Parcel Serice Operator M/s. Kamadenu Express Cargo Movers, Chennai and arriving on 29.01.2013, the officials of the respondent inspected Kamadenu Express Cargo Movers, Chennai. During such search, the petitioner was interrogated by the officials of the respondent and he introduced himself as Proprietor of Kamadenu Express Cargo Movers. The petitioner also produced the relevant documentary records sought for by the officials of the respondent. During the course of examination, the officials of the respondent examined a parcel containing 50 kilograms of Methaguualone, a psychotrophic substance. After observing all the formalities, the officials of the respondent seized all the materials with relevant records and also issued summons to the petitioner for his appearance. Accordingly, the petitioner appeared and a statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act was recorded from him. The respondent thereafter arrested the petitioner and remanded him to judicial custody on 30.01.2013.
(3.) Upon arrest, the petitioner has filed Crl.OP No. 8198 and 14894 of 2013 before this Court and they were dismissed by this Court on 20.06.2013. Thereafter, the present petition seeking bail has been filed by the petitioner on the ground that there is a change of circumstances in the case. According to the petitioner, the investigating agency has now filed the final report in the case and it was taken on file as C.C. No. 4 of 2013 before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, EO-II, Egmore, Chennai and therefore, present petition is maintainable.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.