D BALASUBRAMANIAN Vs. STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
LAWS(MAD)-2011-11-61
HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Decided on November 16,2011

D.BALASUBRAMANIAN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE Respondents




JUDGEMENT

- (1.)THESE Criminal Appeals are filed by A1 and A2 in CC.No.1/2007 against the judgement dated 11.01.2008 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Special Court for CBI Cases, Coimbatore, thereby (a) convicting and sentencing each of the appellants/A1 and A2 for the offence under Section 120B of IPC read with Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months, (b) convicting and sentencing each of the appellants/A1 and A2 for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months and (c) convicting and sentencing each of the appellants/A1 and A2 for the offence under Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months and ordering the sentences to run concurrently.
(2.)THE case of the Prosecution was that the Appellant/A1 was working as a Head Constable in the Railway Protection Force, Erode and the Appellant/A2 was working as a Constable in the said Force. One Ravi, the complainant herein was arrested by RPF, Erode on 26.08.2006 on the allegation of unlawful possession of Railway property at his business premises and was remanded to judicial custody in Cr.No.9/2006. He was released on bail on 02.09.2006 on condition that he should sign at RPF Police Station on every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 10.00 a.m. He proposed to file nomination for contesting the local body election and for that purpose, he wanted to get some particulars. On 25.09.2006, he requested the Appellant/A1 D.Balasubramanian to provide a copy of the First Information Report registered against him by RPF, Erode and A1 demanded a bribe amount of Rs.500/- and asked him to bring the bribe money on the next day, that is, on 26.09.2006. Since the complainant/ PW.3 did not want to pay the bribe amount, he lodged a written complaint Ex.P3 against A1 to CBI. As per the orders of Superintendent of Police, Chennai, a trap was laid by PW.8, Inspector of Police CBI/ACB, Chennai. PW.4, Karthikeyan, the Inspector of Central Excise and K.R.Manoharan were summoned. He introduced them to PW.3 and asked them to read the report Ex.P3. THEreafter, PW.8 demonstrated the phenolphthalein test, after noting down the numbers of the currency notes in the Mahazar Ex.P4. THE tainted currency notes are MO.13 (Series). PW.8 asked PW.4 Karthikeyan to go in advance and watch the conversation between A1 and PW.3 and accordingly, he left to RPF Police Post. He also instructed PW.3 not to touch the money, unless it was demanded. PW.3 left in his TVS Excel Moped. PW.8 and his team followed PW.3 in a Car.
They reached the said RPF Post at 10.30 a.m. PW.8, the Inspector of Police Kalaimani and others took position on the northern gate and the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Roy Alexander, the independent witness K.R.Manoharan, the Sub Inspector K.K.Rajan and the Constable R.Manoharan took position at the southern gate of RPF Post. PW.3 went inside the Office and A1 was not there. A2 was sitting in a room and when PW.3 enquired about A1, A2 asked him why he wanted to see A1 and PW.3 informed that he had come with an application for a copy of FIR as requested by A1. A2 asked him to wait outside and informed the Sub Inspector, who in turn perused the application and then, instructed A2 to furnish the details. A2 took him to the writer and told him that PW.3 was contesting local body election, but he was not making them happy. At that time, A1 came to the room and on seeing A1, A2 told him that PW.3 was not making them happy. On hearing it, A1 informed A2 that on the previous day he had already told him to look after them and asked A2 to receive Rs.500/- from PW.3 and keep it with him. So saying, A1 left the office. Thereafter, A2 gave the details sought for by PW.3 written in a paper. Thereafter, A2 asked for the money and PW.3 asked him whether he could give the money there itself, to which A2 told him to wait near the mango tree. Thereafter, A2 came to the mango tree and PW.3 took the money from his pocket and gave it to A2. He received it in his right hand and kept in his left side shirt pocket and went to the backside of his office. PW.3 gave the pre-arranged signal to PW.8.

On receiving the pre-arranged signal, PW.8 along with his raiding party rushed to the office of the accused and PW.3 identified A2 to PW.8 and stated that the amount was received by A2. PW.4 also narrated the sequence of events to PW.8. Thereafter, PW.8 introduced himself to A2 and enquired him and asked him about the money received from PW.3. A2 admitted the receipt of the currency notes.

(3.)PW.8, then, took him to the office of the Inspector, RPF located at the other end of the Verandah and PW.8 conducted phenolphthalein test in respect of the fingers of left and right hand of A2, his left side shirt pocket and a paper tea cup. The respective solutions turned pink and proved positive. The currency notes were received for phenolphthalein test and the said test proved positive. PW.8 then received RPF identity card.
At that juncture, A1 Balasubramanian came to the Office and PW.3 narrated the sequence of events. When A1 was enquired as to his demand made to PW.3, he admitted the same. His identity card was also seized. Then, A1 and A2 were arrested. PW.8 also received the application given by PW.3 for furnishing details and got the photo copy of the book, in which PW.3 was signing in compliance with the order of the court. The certified copy of the muster roll of A1 and A2 attested by Inspector of RPF was also seized. He also prepared the rough sketch of the RPF Post.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.