STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. SADHU PARMESHWAR RAMSWAMY
LAWS(GJH)-2015-2-156
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
Decided on February 11,2015

STATE OF GUJARAT Appellant
VERSUS
SADHU PARMESHWAR RAMSWAMY Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF GOA VS. SANJAY THAKRAN AND ANR [REFERRED TO]
GIRIJANANDINI DEVI VS. BIJENDRA NARAIN CHOUDHARY [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. HEMAREDDY ALIAS VEMAREDDY [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. SOHAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
M.S. NARAYANA MENON @ MANI VS. STATE OF KERALA AND ANR [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAPPA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
GIRJA PRASAD VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. RAM VEER SINGH [REFERRED TO]
MOOKKIAH VS. STATE, REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE [REFERRED TO]
SHIVASHARANAPPA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. MADAN MOHAN LAL VERMA [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)THE present appeal, under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 7.8.1995 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar in Sessions Case (NDPS) No. 72/1995, whereby, the learned trial Judge acquitted the original accused ­ the respondent herein, of the charges for the offence punishable under Section 8 and 20 of NDPS Act.
(2.)THE brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 10.1.1995, Police Inspector Mr. K.R. Patel along with staff members were on patrolling. At about 12.25noon, when they reached Kamalfali Chowk, Bhavnagar, at that time, on seeing them, the respondent had tried to run away from there, and therefore, on doubt being created, the police had nabbed him and the police had found contraband article "ganja" from the person of respondent. Therefore, panchas were called and panchnama of seizure of contraband article 'ganja' was prepared, and thereafter, the complaint was lodged. Necessary investigation was carried out and statements of several witnesses were recorded. During the course of investigation, respondent was arrested and, ultimately, charge -sheet was filed against him, which was numbered as Sessions Case (NDPS)No. 72/1995. The trial was initiated against the respondent.
(3.)TO prove the case against the present accused, the prosecution has examined witnesses and also produced documentary evidence.
At the end of trial, after recording the statement of the accused under section 313 of Cr.P.C., and hearing arguments on behalf of prosecution and the defence, the learned trial Judge acquitted the respondent of all the charges leveled against him by judgment and order dated 7.8.1995.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.