JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE petitioners by this petition have prayed for the appropriate writ to direct the respondent-Deputy Collector to handover the
possession of the land alloted to the petitioners under Annexure-A and
the petitioners have also prayed to direct the respondent-Deputy
Collector to regularize the agricultural land encroached by the
petitioners and Mr.Parmar, learned advocate for the petitioners during
the course of the hearing submitted that he is not pressing the prayer
8(c) and 8(d).
(2.) IT appears that as per the petitioners vide order dated 6.3.1983, copy whereof is produced at Annexure-A, the land ad-measuring 3 Acres
has been alloted to the petitioner whose name is mentioned at serial
number 40 in the list. As per the petitioner, the said land has not
been handed over. It also appears that as the petitioner anticipating
the allotment of the aforesaid land, has encroached over the land
ad-measuring 12 Acres bearing Survey No.62, 76 and 78. Therefore, the
prayer of the petitioner is to handover the possession of the land
which has been alloted to him and the encroachment made by him over
the land ad-measuring 12 Acres be regularized.
On behalf of the respondent, affidavit-in-reply has been filed; wherein at paragraph Nos.5 and 6, it has been contended inter-alia
that the land which was proposed to be alloted vide order dated
6.3.1983 is a part of protected forest . Therefore, the possession could not be handed over. It has also been submitted that the
petitioner has encroached over the forest land and therefore, such may
not be regularized. It has also been stated in the affidavit-in-reply
that the petitioner No.1 had preferred Regular Civil Suit No.563 of
1986 and the said suit came to be dismissed on 29.11.1988 and the said material fact has been suppressed by the petitioner in the present
petition. Under the circumstances, it is prayed that the petition be
dismissed.
(3.) AS per the petitioner, the land ad-measuring 3 Acres is not a part of the forest land, whereas, as per the respondent authority, the land
is of survey No.62/1 is a part of the forest land. After the allotment
of the land, if it has come to the notice of the Authority that the
land is part of the protected forest land and the possession is not
handed over, such action cannot be said to be arbitrary or unjust as
sought to be canvassed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.