JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in connection with FIR being 31 of 2018 registered
with Jamnagar Panch-?B Division, for offence under
Sections 302 , 365 , 471 , 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal
Code, Sections 25(1B) and 27(1) of the Arms Act and
Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act.
(2.) Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the
offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by
imposing suitable conditions. It is submitted that the
applicant is a young man aged 24 years. From the charge
sheet, it appears that the applicant has been
deliberately targeted as against co-?accused, no role is
given, but the entire blame is shifted on the head of the
applicant. It is submitted that the applicant has been
arrested on 14.05.2018 and since ten, he is in custody
and in present scenario, there is no chance of early
conclusion of trial.
2.1 It is submitted that co-?accused, who have been charge sheeted, have been enlarged on regular bail by coordinate Bench of this Court.
(3.) As against this, learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-?State has opposed grant of
regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the
offence. It is submitted that the offence is of serious
nature where deceased has been shot at from close range.
The evidence indicates use of firearm which has been
discovered at the behest of the applicant. It is
submitted that the prosecution has been able to produce
sufficient evidence to establish motive., The truck in
question was also discovered at the behest of the
applicant and though ballistic report is awaited, there
is sufficient evidence to connect the cause of death to
use of firearm by the applicant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.