MANILAL MOTIJI PATOSANA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
Manilal Motiji Patosana
STATE OF GUJARAT
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Heard Mr. Mukundkumar A. Thakkar, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Ronak B. Raval, learned APP for the
respondents no. 1 to 3 and Mr. Jaydeep H. Sindhi, learned
advocate for the respondents no. 4 and 5.
(2.) Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocates appearing for the respective respondents waive service of Rule on behalf of the
(3.) By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who claims to be the father-in-law of the
Corpus - Hetalben, has prayed for a writ of Habeas Corpus
directing the authorities to produce the Corpus - Hetalben before
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.