INCOME TAX OFFICER Vs. SWASTIK ASSOCIATES
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
INCOME TAX OFFICER
Click here to view full judgement.
KUL BHARAT,JM. -
(1.) THIS appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -XV, Ahmedabad ('CIT(A)' for short) dated 24/02/2011 pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2008
(2.) THE Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal: -
1) The ld.Commissioner of Income -tax(A) -XV, Ahmedabad has erred in law and on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to allow the assessee's claim for deduction of Rs.1,07,27,257/ - u/s.80IB(10).
2) The ld.Commissioner of Income -tax(A) -XV, Ahmedabad has erred in holding that the assessee fulfills the conditions laid down for claiming deduction u/s.80IB(10) even when the land was in the name of Society and the assessee had merely executed a works contract.
3) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(A) -XV, Ahmedabad ought to have upheld the order of the Assessing Officer.
4) It is therefore, prayed that he order of the ld.Commissioner of Income -tax(A) -XV, Ahmedabad may be set -aside and that of the Assessing Officer be restored.
(3.) BRIEFLY stated facts are that the assessee filed its return of income declaring NIL income and claimed deduction u/s.80IB(10) of the Act of Rs.1,07,27,257/ - on 16/09/2008. The case was selected for scrutiny
assessment and the assessment u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the
Act") was framed vide order dated 30/11/2010, thereby the Assessing Officer(AO) disallowed the
deduction amounting to Rs.1,07,27,257/ -. Against this, assessee filed an appeal before the ld.CIT(A), who
following the orders in Asst.Years 2006 -07, 2007 -08 allowed the appeal. Against the order of the ld.CIT
(A), now the Revenue is in appeal before us.
Ground Nos.1 and 2 are inter -connected and, therefore, the same are decided together for the sake of convenience.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.