JUDGEMENT
CHITAMBARESH,J. -
(1.)The goods were entrusted by the plaintiff to
the defendant carrier for despatch from Calicut to
Culcutta. It appears that the goods were transported
from Calicut to Ichapuram by the defendant and later by
another to Culcutta. The fact remains that there was a
short delivery of goods by the time it reached the
consignee. The consignee issued a telegram dated
27.5.1993 to the plaintiff intimating about the short supply of Bowl Assembly of the pump. The plaintiff
thereupon issued Ext.A10 letter dated 31.5.1993 to the
defendant in terms of Section 10 of the Carriers Act,
1865. The same was followed by the present suit claiming the value of the goods not delivered to the
consignee.
(2.)All the issues have been found in favour of the plaintiff by the court below except on two
counts. The first count is that the officer in charge
of the defendant at Mattanur where the goods were
shipped has not been impleaded. We fail to understand
about the necessity for such impleadment when the
defendant is very much a party to the suit. The plea
of non joinder raised by the defendant is bereft of
bona fides and is liable to be rejected.
(3.)The other count mentioned by the court below is the absence of a proper notice under Section
10 of the Carriers Act, 1865. Ext.A10 letter reads as follows: -
"We are pleased to invite your attention to the reference cited. We have now received a telegram from M/s. Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Ltd., Calcutta that they have taken delivery of the materials; but they have received only two packages instead of three contained in that L.R. The package containing the Bowl Assembly of the pump was not delivered. We request you to make an enquiry about the missing package and arrange for its immediate delivery. Please note that the Bowl Assembly is the critical part where the repair works has to be carried out. Without receiving this part the very purpose of sending the pump set to Calcutta can not be served. We, therefore, request you to take a very earnest steps in this regard and inform us the out -come immediately."
Section 10 only warrants a notice in writing of the
loss or injury to be given to the Carrier within six
months of the date of knowledge. The knowledge to the
plaintiff was by telegram dated 27.5.1993 and Ext.P10
letter is issued thereafter on 31.5.1993. A period of
six months has not been elapsed after the date of
knowledge of the plaintiff in issuing a notice under
Section 10 of the Carriers Act.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.