MATHEW P.T. Vs. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM
LAWS(KER)-2022-8-280
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Decided on August 26,2022

Mathew P.T. Appellant
VERSUS
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers :
"(i) To call for the records leading to Ext.P8 and P9

(ii) To issue a writ of certiorari setting aside Ext.P8 and P9

(iii) To declare that the petitioner's request for digging a pond for the purpose of agriculture and fish farming comes within the purview of Rule 104 of Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015.

(iv) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner's application for granting of NOC under Rule 104 of Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015, in accordance with law.

(v) To issue such other appropriate writ order or direction that may be deemed to be just and equitable in the facts and circumstances of the case." [SIC]

(2.)The petitioner is the owner in possession of 8 Acres of land in Re-survey No.225 in Block No. 72 in Poonjar Thekkekara Village. According to the petitioner, he is cultivating various agricultural crops in the property. It is the case of the petitioner that due to acute scarcity of water, especially during the summertime, the petitioner is not able to do his agricultural operations on his land. Under such circumstances, the petitioner decided to dig a pond in his property to enable the petitioner to collect and store water in the pond. Since the area is comprised of granite, the petitioner can dig the pond only after removing a portion of the granite. For the same, the petitioner applied to the authority concerned for getting NOC as contemplated under Rule 104 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 (for short Rules, 2015). It is the case of the petitioner that without considering the purpose and intent of the said rule, the respondents rejected the petitioner's application seeking NOC under Rule 104 of the Rules, 2015 in an arbitrary and mechanical manner. Hence, this writ petition is filed.
(3.)Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.