SHRIRAM CENTRE Vs. STATE OF DELHI
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Click here to view full judgement.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. -
(1.) At the outset, I may note that petitioner No.4 has died. Thus,
qua petitioner No.4 the complaint has abated.
(2.) Notwithstanding various contentions urged in the memorandum of
the petition filed by the petitioners invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that
complaint lodged under Section 22 (A) of the Minimum Wages Act 1948 by Babu Lal,
the Labour Inspector be quashed, at the hearing today, learned counsel for the
petitioner has pressed the petition on 2 counts.
(3.) It is firstly alleged that a perusal of the complaint does not
establish as to what is the case against which accused.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.