JUDGEMENT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW,J. -
(1.) The petitioner, a Commandant (Medical) with the respondent No.5 Assam Rifles and on inter-force transfer/deputation to the respondents
No.2&3 Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) and presently posted at Referral
Hospital ITBP, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, has filed this petition (a)
impugning the order dated 15th July, 2020 whereby the petitioner has been
asked to report back to his parent cadre i.e. the respondent No.5 Assam
Rifles; and, (b) seeking mandamus to the respondents to allow the petitioner
to continue at his present place of posting, for another two years, as per the
Office Memorandums (OMs) dated 22nd November, 2016 and 18th May,
2018, thereby allowing the petitioner to take medical treatment for his son; and, (c) in the alternative, seeking mandamus to the respondents to extend
the benefit/relaxation as provided in the OMs dated 6 th June, 2014, 17th
November, 2014 and 5th January, 2016 issued by the Department of
Personnel and Training (DoPT).
(2.) It is the case of the petitioner, (i) that he was appointed as an Assistant Commandant (MO) in the respondent No.5 Assam Rifles in February, 2003
and was in the year 2007 promoted to the rank of Deputy Commandant; (ii)
that the petitioner, in or about the years 2007-2008 applied for permission to
apply for Post Graduation and which permission was granted and
accordingly, the petitioner, in the years 2008-2011 completed his Doctorate
in Medicine in Radio Diagnosis, from Armed Forces Medical College, Pune;
(iii) that between the years 2011-2017, the petitioner remained posted at
Nagaland, Dimapur and in the year 2012 promoted to the rank of Second-in-
Commandant and in the year 2016 to the rank of Commandant; (iv) that a
son was born to the petitioner and his wife on 27 th December, 2011, who in
the years 2012-2013 was found to be suffering from squint and was under
treatment at Shankar Netralaya, Guwahati; (v) that the son of the petitioner
thereafter developed persistent seizure attacks and was diagnosed to be
suffering from Hypoxic Ischemic Insult and secondary seizures/cerebral
palsy and was being treated at Guwahati; (vi) that however the medical
condition of the son of the petitioner kept deteriorating and he also
developed deformities in his right leg and right hand and also suffered loss
of learning abilities; (vii) that the petitioner, for all the said reasons took
extended leave in the year 2016 for the medical treatment of his son; (viii)
that the petitioner thereafter applied for the post of General Duty Medical
Officer in ITBP, on deputation and the competent authority, vide order dated
30th May, 2017, approved the inter-force transfer of the petitioner from the respondent No.5 Assam Rifles to respondents No.2&3 ITBP and vide Signal
dated 10th July, 2017 posted the petitioner to the Referral Hospital ITBP,
Greater Noida, on compassionate grounds, for a period of three years only;
(ix) that the petitioner since then is at Referral Hospital ITBP, Greater Noida
and has been making all efforts to have his son treated at Vardhman
Mahaveer Medical College (VMMC) and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi
and the son of the petitioner has shown signs of improvement; (x) that the
son of the petitioner requires regular follow up at VMMC and at Safdarjung
Hospital as well as physiotherapy and has been attending Special Children
School at Greater Noida and has been issued a "80% permanently physically
handicapped" certificate; (xi) that the petitioner made a representation dated
22nd August, 2019 to the respondents requesting the respondents to extend his deputation tenure for five years as per the prevalent policy; (xii) that the
Policy Guidelines for Deputation of Combatised Central Armed Police
Forces (CAPFs) and Assam Rifles (AR) Personnel in Other Organisations,
issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on 22nd November, 2016
clearly state that the tenure of deputation to the other CAPF and Central
Government Organisations will initially be five years and further extendable
upto seven years; (xiii) that the petitioner thus is entitled to the minimum
tenure till 17th July, 2022; (xiv) that on the representation aforesaid of the
petitioner, the respondent No.4 Additional Director General (ADG)
(Medical) (CAPFs, National Security Guard (NSG) and AR), sought certain
comments / recommendations on the requirement of the petitioner in the
Referral Hospital, Greater Noida; (xv) that the Inspector General (IG)
(Medical), Referral Hospital ITBP, Greater Noida vide letter dated 30 th
November, 2019 clarified that the petitioner as a Radiologist is required to
run and keep the department functional, as in Radiology Department of the
hospital there is already heavy load of patients and the hospital is also in the
process of expansion; it was also clarified that the petitioner is main care
giver to his own son, who is differently abled; the petitioner was
recommended the full term of five years; (xvi) that MHA, vide order dated
30th October, 2015 directed that the inter-force transfer/deputation of all doctors will continue to be decided by the MHA on the proposal of the
Director General of the forces concerned and the recommendation of
ADG(Medical); (xvii) that however the respondents are not extending the
tenure of deputation of the petitioner and not forwarding the case of the
petitioner to the MHA; (xviii) that even the OM dated 6th June, 2014
regarding posting of government employees who have differently abled
dependants provides that a government servant who is also a care giver of
disabled child may be exempted from the routine exercise of
transfer/rotational transfer, subject to administrative constraints; (xix) that
DoPT OMs dated 6th June, 2014, 17th November, 2014 and 5th January, 2016
also categorically provide that government employees who are care giver of
disabled child will be exempted from the routine exercise of
transfer/rotational transfer, subject to administration constraints; (xx) that as
per the OM dated 18th May, 2018 of the DoPT also, the period of
deputation/foreign service shall be as per the Recruitment Rules (RRs) of
the ex-cadre post or five years in case no tenure regulations exist for the ex-
cadre post; (xxi) that the RRs of the Medical Officer Cadre of the
respondent No.5 Assam Rifles nowhere state the tenure of deputation and
thus the petitioner, under the OM dated 18th May, 2018 is entitled to the
deputation from the respondent No.5 Assam Rifles to the respondents
No.2&3 ITBP at least for a period of five years; (xxii) that the respondent
No.5 Assam Rifles, vide order dated 15th January, 2020 to the Referral
Hospital ITBP Greater Noida, requested that on the deputation of the
petitioner coming to an end on 17th July, 2020, the petitioner be released;
(xxiii) that the petitioner made another representation dated 31st January,
2020 to the respondents; and, (xxiv) that the respondents, vide impugned order dated 15th July, 2020, rejected the petitioner "?s representation for
extension of tenure and directed the petitioner to be relieved from the
respondents No.2&3 ITBP.
(3.) It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that the respondent No.5 Assam Rifles is posted at the extremist and the remotest areas of the
country and if the petitioner is repatriated to his parent organization i.e.
Assam Rifles then he would be posted in such remote and extreme locations
which would not be a suitable environment to raise his son aforesaid.;