JUDGEMENT
L.C.BHADOO, J. -
(1.) THE petitioner, who is the holder of two regular stage carriage permits on the route Abikapur to Sankh via Batoli, Sitapur, Pathalgaon, Ludeg,
Kansabail, Kunkuri, Jashpurnagar, Gohling & back, has preferred this writ
petition being aggrieved by the grant of temporary stage carriage permit to
respondent No.2 by respondent No.1-Regional Transport Authority,
Chhattisgarh, Raipur on the route Ambikapur to Sankh for the month of
June, 2005.
(2.) BRIEF facts leading to filing of this writ petition are that respondent No.2 herein applied for grant of temporary stage carriage permit on the route
Ambikapur to Sankh on the ground of heavy traffic on account of marriage
season apart from Kabir Jayanti, Rana Pratap Jayanti & Rani Durgavati
sacrifice day. The petitioner's challenge to the said grant of temporary permit
is tnat the said temporary permit has been granted without formulation of the
route by the State Government under Section 68(3)(ca) of the Motor Vehicles
Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1988') and the application
for grant of temporary permit has been filed to S.T.A., Bilaspur, whereas no
such authority is functioning. Respondent No.1 vide order dated 3-6-2005
granted temporary stage carriage permit to respondent No.2 for the period 5-6-2005
to 30-6-2005 and in the said temporary permit timing for departure
from Ambikapur has been granted at 22-30 p.m., which is just 25 minutes
after the regular service of the petitioner under Permit No.2118/B/05 and
arrival time for Sankh has been granted at 4.00 p.m., which is just 35 minutes
before the arrival time of the petitioner's service. Similarly, return timing of
the petitioner is 6.00 am. Whereas return timing of respondent No. 2 is 5.30
am, which is 30 minutes ahead of the petitioner's regular service, the major
portion of the permit is common and grant of timings to temporary permit is
not in the public interest.
Return has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 in which it has been mentioned that it is incorrect to say that the temporary stage carriage
permit has been granted to respondent No.2 without formulation of the route
under Section 68(3)(ca), as the route from Ambikapur to Sankh has already
been notified by the State Government on 14-6-2004 at Sr. No. 444 vide
Annexure Rl-1. It has further been mentioned that the temporary permit
was granted looking to the need of general public of Bageecha & Narayanpur.
It has also been mentioned that out of total 212 km route, 94 km route is
common in both the permits i.e. regular & temporary permits and the
temporary permit granted in favour of respondent No.2 is 32 km less than
the route of petitioner's permit.
(3.) RETURN has also been filed on behalf of respondent No.2.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.