JUDGEMENT
SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J. -
(1.) HEARD Shri Anoop Majumdar, counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) THIS revision has been filed under section 23-E of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 against the impugned order dated 21-8-2000 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Rajnandgaon in Case No.5-
A/90 year 1999-2000.
The facts of the case are that the petitioner who is shown to be the widow of late Samaru Lal Sahu, aged about 70 years, filed an application for
eviction before the Rent Controlling Authority u/s 23-A of the M.R
Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') pleading all the
ingredients which are required under the law to be pleaded in an application
for eviction u/s 23-A of the aforesaid Act. The Copy of the application is
filed before this Court as Annexure A-2
(3.) THE Rent Controlling Authority took cognizance in the matter and issued a notice to the respondent on which the respondent also caused his
appearance before the said Authority. It appears that the respondent had
filed his written statement and alongwith the written statement, he also filed
a preliminary objection dated 16-5-2000, a copy of which has been filed as
Annexure A-4. In this preliminary objection, the respondent has raised this
ground that in fact, the petitioner is not the landlady of the rented premises,
therefore, she is not entitled to prosecute the proceedings for eviction and
this point regarding the status of the petitioner should be decided first and
the proceedings should not be prosecuted before deciding this point.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.