MAHILA BACHAT SAMUH MITGAI Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
LAWS(CHH)-2022-2-60
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Decided on February 21,2022

Mahila Bachat Samuh Mitgai Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

P.SAM KOSHY,J. - (1.)The matter was taken up in post lunch session.
(2.)The categorical contention of the counsel for the petitioner was that the impugned order has been passed in a pre-determined and hasty manner as it would go to show that no fair and reasonable opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner. It was also the contention of the petitioner that the exact nature of allegation and charge levelled against the petitioner, is also not being made known to the petitioner so as to what is the reason for which the impugned order Annexure P/1 has been passed.
(3.)Learned State Counsel prayed that the matter may be taken up in post lunch session enabling him to seek instruction.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.