JUDGEMENT
Puttaswamy, J. -
(1.) Whether a living spouse can claim
conferment of occupancy rights as a
tenant of the other living spouse; to an
agricultural 'land under the Karnataka
Land Reforms Act, 1961 (Karnataka Act
10 of 1962) ('the Act') is the short and
interesting question that arises for our
determination in these cases. In order
to appreciate the question it is first
necessary to notice the facts as set out
or as admitted by the appellants.
(2.) Lands bearing Sy. Nos. 79/2,
79/7 and 77/3 measuring 69 cents, 10
cents and 1 acre 17 cents respectively of
Kariangala Village, Buntwal Taluk, are
agricultural lands.
"Smt. A. Jatajakshi D. Alwa,
ppellant in Writ Appeal No. 1718 of
1980, a resident of Ammunje village
BuntweI Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District,
had married one A. Deva Alwa of
the same village and was living with him
till the latter died in the year 1979."
"On or about 21-10-1975, the
appellant made an application under
Section 48-A(1) of the Act before the
Land Tribunal, Buntwal ('LT, Buntwal')
for conferment of occupancy rights over
the said lands describing her husband as
her land lord and that she was his tenant
for 25 years. On 17-10-1978 the LT,
Buntwal considered the maintainability
of the said application and rejected the
same as not maintainable under the
Act (Exhibit-A). in Writ Petition No.
1086 of 1980, the appellant challenged
the said order of that Tribunal before
this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of
the Constitution. On 11-3-1980, Kudoor,
J. rejected the same (This decision
Kudoor, J. has been reported in 1980(2)
Kar. L. J. 60 - Editor. Aggrieved by the said
order of Kudoor, J. the appellant has
filed Writ Appeal No. 1718 of 1980
before us :"
(3.) Kalingaraj Urs of Amchawadi
village, Aradhanahalli Hobii, Chamarajnagar
Taluk, Mysore District, who is the
appellant in W A. No. 173 of 1981 is the
husband of Smt. Krishnarajammanni who
is respondent-3.
Land bearing Sy. No. 603/1
of Amchavadi village measuring 2 acres
4 guntas is an agricultural land.
On 7-10-1974 the appellant
made an application under Section 48-A
(1) of the Act before the Land Tribunal
Chamarajnagar Taluk (LT, Chamarajnagar)
for conferment of occupancy rights over
the said land describing respondent-3 as
the land lord of the said land and that
he was the tenant of his wife from 1972-
73 to 1974-75 (vide the certified copy
produced in Writ Petition No. 96 of
1977). The appellant does not dispute
that the said land was originally owned
by one Nanjundaswamy who had mortgaged
the same with possession to respondent-3
on 29-12-1971 and that on
17-4-1973 the said Nanjundaswamy sold
the same to respondent-4 subject to the
mortgage in favour of his wife. He
also does not dispute that respondent-4
has redeemed that mortgage.
"After a series of proceedings
the detailed nanation of which is not
very necessary the Tribunal overruling
the objections of respondent-4 on 28-6-79
allowed the application made by the
appellant and granted him occupancy
rights over the said land. In Writ Petition
No. 8860 of 1979, respondent-4
challenged the said order of the Tribunal
before this Court under Articles 226 and
227 of the Constitution. On 1-1-1981
Bhimiah, J. (as His Lordship then was)
has allowed the same and has quashed
the order made by the Tribunal. Hence,
this appeal by the appellant before us.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.