(1.) Petitioner instituted O.S. No. 189 of 2007 against the respondents, in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Gadag, to pass a decree for partition and separate possession and to grant him 2/5th share in the suit properties. Defendants having filed written statements, issues were raised on 3-1-2008. Issue 5 reads as under:
(2.) Heard the learned Counsel on both sides and perused the writ record. Since the issue relating to insufficiency of Court fee paid has been raised on 3-1-2008, the Trial Court ought to have tried and decided the said issue as a preliminary issue. There is a procedural impropriety in not treating the said issue as a preliminary issue and in allowing IA-IX. In the circumstances, impugned order being vitiated, warrants interference.