JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition is disposed of at the stage
of preliminary hearing after notice to
the respondents.
(2.) The petitioner Dr. B.R. Badriprasad is a graduate in Dental Surgery
of the Bangalore University having
completed House Surgeonship from
3.10.1979 to 2.4.1980 in the Government Dental College at Bangalore.
Thereafter he has been practising privately in a Dental Clinic at Bangalore.
He .applied for a seat for the post graduate course in Dental College preferably
P.G. Course in Orthodontia
for the academic year 1981-82. The
petitioner wag not called for interview
by the Selection Committee constituted
under the Rules framed by an executive order of the Government for
selection and admission to the Post Graduate dental course offerred by the
University of Bangalore. The
said rules are called the Karnataka
Dental College (Selection for Post Graduate Course) Rules, 1981.
The petitioner has himself produced a true copy
of the Rules at Annexure-B, to the petion. The petitioner has alleged that
respondent No.3 has been selected by
respondent No. 2 which is contrary to
the Rules and thereby discriminated
against him though respondent No. 3
has obtained lesser marks in his degree
course than the petitioner. He has further alleged that the selection of the
3rd respondent was contrary to clause
4 of the Rules in as much as respondent-3 has not completed the House
manship prescribed for a period exceeding 12 months in any Government
Hospital. This allegation is supported
by Annexure-C, which is a true copy
of the endorsement issued by the Director of Medical Education in Karnataka
dt. .19.5.1981. It is in that circumstance, the petitioner has approached
this Court under Art. 226 of the,Con- '
stitution praying for a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to
provide admission to the petitioner in
the Dental College for Post Graduate
Course in Orthodontia and to give other
consequential relief like costs etc.
(3.) Respondents have entered appearance. On behalf of respondents 1 and 2,
it was contended that the 3rd respondent has been admitted to the Course as
a nominee of the Government of India,
under Rule 4(2) of the Rules which
provides for two seats being reserved
for candidates nominated by the Government of India. Similarly sub-rules
(1) and (3) of Rule 4 also provide for
reservation. Rule 5 provides for reservation of seats in favour of candidates
belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Tribes, etc. The
procedure of selection is under Rule, 8
of the Rules. The selection is subject to
reservation made under Rules 4 and 5.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.