SAROJ MAHESHWARI Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
STATE OF HARYANA
Click here to view full judgement.
ANIL R.DAVE, J. -
(1.) Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) Leave granted.
(3.) Upon perusal of the impugned judgment, it appears that the possession of the land in question was with
the owners of the land in question in 2002 -2003.
Whereas, as per the respondents the possession was
taken over in the year 1995 -1996. There appears to
be some doubt, which was not examined by the High
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.