DEVRAJ Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
LAWS(SC)-2016-7-54
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: CHHATTISGARH)
Decided on July 25,2016

DEVRAJ Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

MAHESHWAR KALAR VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2016-8-62] [REFERRED TO]
DHARMENDER KUMAR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2016-8-304] [REFERRED TO]
FAKHAR UDDIN VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2022-6-37] [REFERRED TO]
BOLLAVARAPU KANAKA RAJU RAJU VS. STATE OF A.P. [LAWS(APH)-2020-7-30] [REFERRED TO]
HIRA LAL & OTHERS VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2017-3-254] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD KUMAR VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2023-4-127] [REFERRED TO]
KACHARU RAM VS. THAN SINGH [LAWS(CHH)-2016-9-11] [REFERRED]
RAM ALIAS CHANDER, SON OF JILEDAR ARE RESIDENTS OF VILLAGE VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2017-12-258] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. OM PARKASH [LAWS(HPH)-2018-3-97] [REFERRED TO]
KHANDU S/O RAVAN SHINDE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2018-10-143] [REFERRED TO]
MAGANBHAI KHATUBHAI KATARA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-9-129] [REFERRED TO]
SAJU VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2021-3-97] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2020-9-378] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR @ MITHU & OTHERS VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2016-9-99] [REFERRED TO]
SABIR HUSAIN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2017-1-265] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 7th January, 2013 of the High Court of Chhattisgarh in Criminal Appeal No. 780 of 2008. The First Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Trial No.396 of 2006 had convicted the appellant-Devraj and Dinda @ Deenanath under Section 302 and 201 IPC and awarded imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each for the charge levelled under Section 302 IPC and RI for three years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each for the charge under Section 201 IPC. Four other accused were acquitted by the First Additional Sessions Judge. The High Court in Criminal Appeal No.780 of 2008 although acquitted the accused Dinda @ Deenanath, it confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC. The High Court has set aside the conviction and sentence of Devraj under Section 201 IPC.
(2.)Aggrieved by the judgment and order of the High Court, Devraj has come up in this appeal.
(3.)The prosecution case in brief is:
There existed a land dispute between the deceased Devi Prasad @ Prachar and Devraj, Dinda @ Deenanath. Devraj and Dinda @ Deenanath are real brothers whereas deceased Devi Prasad was their cousin brother. On 26th June, 2006, after 8 p.m. when deceased Devi Prasad was going along with one Ratan Singh Guruji in a motorcycle he was intercepted by five persons near pakkar tree. The deceased was beaten by geda and lathi by Devraj, Dinda and others and after killing him his body along with motorcycle was thrown below Rakhet Pulia. The body was seen on next day morning by a boy of village who informed the wife of the deceased. Thereafter, First Information Report was lodged by Anita Bai at 10.15 a.m. on 27th June, 2006. Police official came on the spot prepared death panchnama and site plan. The statements from various persons were recorded. The charges were framed against six accused under Section 147, 148,149, 302 and 201 IPC. The accused Sheonath, Thema @ Vishwanath, Devraj, Dinda @ Deenanath, Khoru and Dayalal were sent for trial.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.