VIJAY SHANKAR MISHRA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
VIJAY SHANKAR MISHRA
Union of India And Ors
Click here to view full judgement.
D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. -
(1.) These appeals arise from judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal dated 23 September 2010 and 15 September, 2016.
(2.) The appellant was enrolled in the Army Medical Corps on 23 June 1984. On 3 October 1997, a notice to show cause was issued to him to explain why
he should not be discharged from service under Rule 13(3)III(v) of the Army
Rules on the ground that his conduct which in service had not been found
satisfactory. On 15 October 1997 the appellant was placed in a low medical
category BEE (Permanent). On 4 December 1998, he was discharged from
service under Rule 13(3) Table (III)(v). By that time he had rendered
service of 13 years 8 months and 19 days (excluding 188 days non qualifying
service). The minimum qualifying service for earning pension under Rule 132
of the Pension Regulations for the Army 1961 (Part-I) is fifteen years. By an
order of 22 May 1999 the appellant was also denied disability pension.
(3.) The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Madhya Pradesh High Court which was dismissed on 21 November 2006. In appeal a Division
Bench by its judgment dated 3 January 2007 directed reconsideration of the
case of the appellant in terms of a circular bearing No.0201/A/164/Admn-1
dated 10 January 1989. Pursuant to the order of the High Court an order was
issued on 26 February 2007 rejecting his claim for pension on the ground that
he did not have fifteen years' service and had been discharged for the reason
that he was unlikely to become an efficient soldier. Moreover, it was stated
that disability pension was denied to the appellant (despite being placed in a
low medical category on account of primary hypertension) on the ground that
he had earned six red ink entries which were a part of an award of punishment
on nine occasions.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.